Home | Contact URC | Links | Site contents | Intranet | Search
 

Highlights
Activities
Publications
Newsletters
Staff
About URC
Africa Negotiators Meetings
African Rural Energy Enterprises
AIACC Climate, Water & Agriculture
Alleviation of Poverty through Local Energy
Baseline methodologies
Brazil Rural Energy Enterprises
Carbon Finance for Sustainable Energy
Climate Policy Frameworks Beyond 2012
Climate Screening
Commercialization of RE in ASEAN
Development and Climate
Economics of GHG Limitations
EE Financial Intermediation Mechanisms
Energy Planning in Burkina Faso
Energy Policymaking in the Caribbean
Energy pricing and sustainability
Evaluation of liability provisions
Financing Indian Solar Home Systems
Financing Renewables in the Philippines
Global Overlays for Transport Sector
Green IPP Network in ASEAN
Improving Impacts of Rural Electrification
Mitigation analysis in South Africa
National Communications Support
Overcoming Barriers to RETs in India
Participation in IPCC activities
Planning and Strategies for CDM
Power Reform & Sustainable Development
Power Sector Reform in Sub-Saharan Africa
Promoting Investments in EE and RETs
RE Financing in the Mediterranean
RE Rural Electrification in Cambodia
Removal of Barriers to RETs in Africa
Renewable energy in Pacific Islands
Stimulating EU-Indochina RE Projects
Strategy for  RETs in South Africa
Sustainable Energy Advisory Facility
Sustainable Urban Transportation
Technical support for NAPA
Wind Energy Development in ASEAN
Wind Energy in the 21st Century
Wind Power Projects in the CDM

Back
Up
 

Evaluation of liability provisions for the Kyoto Mechanisms

A number of liability provisions for international emissions trading and joint implementation has been proposed. Their aim is to deter overselling of rights to additional emissions by Annex I Parties whose actual emissions are lower than their commitments.

The purpose of the study is to develop a simple model to compare different liability proposals in terms of their ability to bring the Kyoto Protocol into compliance, including expected levels of cost.

The study, financed by EPRI, was developed by Margaree Consultants. UCCEE assisted in modeling the liability options under analysis.

Get the full story.

 

UNEP Risoe Centre • Risoe DTU, Bldg. 142 • Frederiksborgvej 399 • P.O. Box 49 • DK 4000 Roskilde • Denmark

 

Contact the webmaster
May 26, 2000